Share

POLITICS

10 House Republican talking points against the Senate immigration bill

|
Politics,Beltway Confidential,Congress,Conn Carroll,Immigration,Analysis

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., gave House Republicans an “Immigration Resource Kit” Friday, including these 10 talking points against S. 744, the citizenship for illegal immigrants bill passed by the Senate this June.

1. Unconstitutional: The Senate immigration bill is a revenue-raising bill, which makes it unconstitutional. Specifically, the bill contains a wide range of effects on federal revenues, including changes in collections of income and payroll taxes, certain visa fees that are classified as revenues, and various fines and penalties. Language in the U.S. Constitution requires that any bill that raises revenue, also known as a tax, must originate in the House of Representatives, not the Senate.

2. Legalization before border security: Six months from the bill’s enactment, the Secretary of Homeland Security must submit a border security plan. Once this plan is submitted—meaning that the border does not have to be secure—unlawful immigrants can then apply for legal status, which is called “registered provisional status (RPI).” Adjustment from RPI status to Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) status can begin when the border security plan is deployed, the border fence and electronic verification system have been implemented, the exit system is being used, and 38,405 Border Patrol agents have been deployed on the Southwest border. This means that nothing has to be fully implemented before legalization and there are no assurances that the border has to be secure. Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security can ignore these requirements after 10 years of litigation or a Supreme Court ruling has prevented these triggers from being implemented.

3. Lack of border security: Under the Schumer-Hoeven-Corker Amendment, the so called “border surge” amendment, approximately 38,405 Border Patrol agents will be deployed, maintained, and stationed along the Southwest border. However, the agents do not have to be deployed before 2021, which is well after legalization takes place. Under the provision, DHS’s goal in allocating the additional Border Patrol agents to airports shall be to reduce wait times, not to enforce immigration law, apprehend illegal immigrants, seize illegal contraband, or improve national security. This is hardly a border surge.

4. Interior enforcement is virtually nonexistent: Under the Senate immigration bill, the interior enforcement of our immigration laws would be completely gutted. Specifically:

— President Still Has On/Off Switch: The Senate bill does not take away the immigration enforcement “on/off switch” from the President. The House enforcement bill (SAFE Act) does this by granting states the authority to enforce the laws in the future.

 Enforcement Free Zones: The bill allows the Secretary of DHS to designate enforcement free areas where no immigration activity can take place.

 Halts Immigration Enforcement: Creates an immigration enforcement holiday where no enforcement actions will occur for two and a half years.

 Countless Waivers: Under the Senate bill, wherever enforcement is mentioned, there is a waiver authority delegated to the Secretary of DHS, repeating many of the same problems we have today with the lack of immigration enforcement.

5. Won’t end illegal immigration: Despite all the money being spent in the bill that is supposed to secure our porous borders, the Congressional Budget Office has said that the Senate immigration bill will only reduce illegal immigration by one-third to one-half.

6. Special pathway to citizenship: The Senate bill creates an entirely new, currently nonexistent path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. Also, the Senate bill decreases the time required for most immigrants to apply for naturalization from five to three years.

7. Endangers our communities: Under the Senate immigration bill, the Secretary of DHS is provided with broad authority to waive criminal conduct, including gang affiliations, felony arrests, and multiple misdemeanor convictions. The bill allows the Secretary to waive background checks, does not require dangerous criminal aliens to be detained, and makes it easier for persecutors and human rights abusers to obtain immigration benefits. The bill also allows criminal immigrants to continue to commit and be convicted of criminal offenses after receiving provisional legal status, as long as the individual’s convictions remain below the eligibility threshold. In addition, the bill allows those with multiple convictions to enter, remain, and not be subject to detention in the U.S.

8. Releases criminals back onto the streets: Current law requires certain criminal immigrants who are in the process of being deported to be detained in order to protect the American people. However, the Senate bill undermines this commonsense requirement and instead allows dangerous criminals to be released back onto our streets, only to be monitored by advocacy organizations.

9. Unworkable ag guestworker program: The Senate immigration bill contains an unworkable agricultural guest worker program that would subject farmers to unnecessary regulations and excessive litigation.

10. Contains slush fund for liberal activist groups: Under the Senate bill, new grant programs are created that could provide $150 million dollars to liberal activist groups like La Raza, Casa de Maryland, and the American Immigration Lawyers Association. These taxpayer-funded grants are provided to organizations — without any audit or oversight provisions — in order to promote the new special pathway to citizenship though public information campaigns, to help unlawful immigrants apply for new immigration benefits, and to provide any other assistance considered useful to unlawful immigrants in the process.

View article comments Leave a comment