Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 22, 2013 | 11:01 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

Daily Contraception Mandate Lie: Who started it?

March 12, 2012
Leave a comment

 

[Apologies for not posting the Daily Contraception Mandate Lie last Thursday and Friday, a family medical emergency – now all cleared up, it seems – interfered.]

Defense of the contraception mandate has rested on not merely speaking falsely, but actually inverting the truth – saying the exact opposite of what is true. For instance, defending a government mandate that employers provide birth-control coverage by saying government and employers shouldn’t get involved in birth control is kind of like defending TARP by saying government shouldn’t get involved in banking.

One interesting inversion is the claim that the Right picked this fight.

  • Chuck Schumer, according to The Hill, said “Republicans are ginning up a debate over social issues to distract from the improving economy.”
  • Bob Schieffer made it sound like the GOP had picked this fight, too: “we’ve spent the last couple of weeks here talking about running against birth control for goodness sake”
  • “If Republicans would stop all this ridiculous talk about contraception, I’d consider voting in November,” said one woman in the New York Times.
  • And here, right-leaning blogger Tom Dougherty tells Republicans to drop the issue of the contraception mandate.

But this isn’t a war of choice for orthodox Catholics. The Obama administration wants to make us all buy contraception coverage. They say we’re trying to make it illegal to buy contraception while they’re trying to make it illegal to not buy contraception – whether we use it is still up to us, but whether we pay for it through our employer-sponsored plan is not.

So conservatives did not pick this fight. Obama’s HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius picked the fight by introducing government into a question that used to be private, thus infringing on individual liberty in a way that many Americans find violates their conscience.

We’re fighting back. Maybe you think that’s a losing political thing to do, but that doesn’t mean (a) we shouldn’t fight, or (b) that we started the fight.

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • He’s No Nixon

    The thoughtful Carl Cannon has written a piece, " Richard Milhous Obama ," concluding that our current president has more in common with our 37th than President Obama's partisans would like to...

    Read More...

  • IRS's Lerner Had History of Harassment, Inappropriate Religious Inquiries at FEC

    Perhaps no other IRS official is more intimately associated with the tax agency's growing scandal than Lois Lerner, director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division. Since admitting the IRS...

    Read More...

  • Yet Another Obamacare Design Flaw

    The more the evidence emerges, the more one has to wonder: Could Obamacare have been designed any more poorly? Even those who don’t mind Obamacare’s striking consolidation of power and money...

    Read More...