Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 19, 2013 | 10:31 PM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

Chamber of Commerce: White House must ask Supreme Court to rule on NLRB appointments

February 5, 2013 | 10:14 am
Leave a comment

In an op-ed in Politico today, Chamber of Commerce President Tom Donohue says the current state of limbo regarding the National Labor Relations Board is untenable for the business community. He’s referring to the fact that an Appeals Court has ruled that President Obama’s recess appointees to the board were unconstitutional. The board has vowed to continue its job of overseeing management/labor relations as if the ruling didn’t happen.

This can’t go on, Donohue warns:

Those regulated by the NLRB now face a host of difficult questions: Are the NLRB’s orders currently valid? Will they be invalidated in the future? Can a company reopen a case that has already been decided against it? Does a company need to raise a challenge to the recess appointments in its own case? What will happen if the NLRB sues to enforce an order outside of the D.C. Circuit? Should a company rush to file an appeal in the D.C. Circuit? Can a company wait to see what happens in the Supreme Court, or must it comply with an NLRB order now?

While the NLRB shrugs its shoulders and says, “So what?” the business community is asking, “Now what?” The administration knew full well that these controversial appointments would be challenged. Now, it must take some sensible steps to avoid adding to uncertainty and wasting time and money.

First, the Department of Justice should seek Supreme Court review of the decision as soon as possible to achieve nationwide certainty on the validity of the recess appointments. It should not, as some press reports have suggested, wait for a more favorable decision to be issued by a different appeals court. The case is ready for review now.

Second, pending a Supreme Court ruling, the NLRB and other affected agencies should hold off taking major actions that they know may be invalidated in the future.

Third, rather than deny the effect of the D.C. Circuit’s decision, the government should find a fair and orderly way to process the claims of those who are adversely affected.

An appropriate response by the administration to the ruling requires acting swiftly to bring needed clarity to employers and employees alike.

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • Ideological Revenue Service

    With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press...

    Read More...

  • The Real Scandal

    Everyone in Washington, except those in the crosshairs, likes a good scandal, and THE WEEKLY STANDARD is no exception. What’s more, in the case of the Obama administration, comeuppance is well...

    Read More...

  • When It Rains, It Pours

    There is no curse on the second term of presidents. When presidents lose credibility, when trust vanishes and their word is no longer accepted, they have only themselves to blame. That was true...

    Read More...