Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 19, 2013 | 12:22 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

Conservative defense hawks make their peace with the sequester

January 24, 2013 | 9:20 am | Modified: January 24, 2013 at 9:35 am
Leave a comment

It has become obvious to more and more observers that the impending trillion dollar discretionary spending cuts, scheduled to begin March 1st, are going to happen. It is next to impossible to find any Republican on Capitol Hill who can explain how they will be avoided. And now, even the most conservative pro-defense Republicans are beginning to acknowledge this reality.

“I’m pretty sure it is going to happen now,” House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon, R-Calif., told Politico yesterday. “I guess the feeling is until everybody feels enough pain, we’re not going to do the things that we really need to do. And that scares me.”

American Enterprise Institute defense expert Mackenzie Eaglen also sees no way around the scheduled defense spending cuts. She told Human Events last week, “At the end of the day, there aren’t going to be any more acceptable alternative spending cuts to replace the sequester, or more tax increases. We know some type of sequestration’s going to happen for defense, because there is nowhere else to go. The continuous punting is not a solution.”

The 2011 Budget Control Act cut $492 billion from defense spending through 2011, including $55 billion in 2013 alone.

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • Ideological Revenue Service

    With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press...

    Read More...

  • The Real Scandal

    Everyone in Washington, except those in the crosshairs, likes a good scandal, and THE WEEKLY STANDARD is no exception. What’s more, in the case of the Obama administration, comeuppance is well...

    Read More...

  • When It Rains, It Pours

    There is no curse on the second term of presidents. When presidents lose credibility, when trust vanishes and their word is no longer accepted, they have only themselves to blame. That was true...

    Read More...