"As much as any state in the U.S., Oklahoma is a victim of climate change," Mother Jones observed. "In 2011, notes the newly released U.S. National Climate Assessment, the state suffered from its hottest summer on record ... And the report states as plainly as you can that climate change was involved."
Not a dust bowl
Apparently, Mother Jones isn't aware that history didn't stop after the Dust Bowl created Oklahoma's indelible "grapes of wrath" Image during the Great Depression.
In fact, as Sierra Rayne notes in American Thinker, Oklahoma's climate is, uh, changing, for the better from those sad days when half the state moved to California.
"The Sooner State has a statistically significant increasing -- not decreasing -- trend in annual precipitation since records begin in 1895. That would be the complete opposite of 'drying up,'" said Rayne.
Real climate change
It gets even worse, according to Rayne, for the global warming propagandists the deeper one dives into the Oklahoma weather data:
* "There are no negative trends in annual precipitation for any of Oklahoma's nine climate sub-regions, either, over the past 120 years. None.
* "There are no declining trends in summertime precipitation for the state as a whole, nor in any of its climate sub-regions, since 1895. None.
* "You may also be interested to know that there are also no significant trends in Oklahoma's statewide average annual or summertime temperatures since 1895."
Who to believe?
The National Climate Assessment cited by Mother Jones was written by politicians seeking to advance President Obama's political agenda.
The data cited by Rayne was collected over the years by the National Weather Service. Like it or not, the numbers show Oklahoma getting wetter, not drier, over time.
Looks like those *Okies in the state legislature who rejected the new science "standards" know real climate change when they see it.
* Full Disclosure: The author was born and raised in Oklahoma and is quite happy to explain why he's proud of the fact (probably in greater detail than anybody not born there cares to hear).
On today's washingtonexaminer.com
Watchdog/Luke Rosiak: Federal version of workplace charity drive means getting paid to "volunteer" and barely breaking even (Part Two of a three-part series).
Columnist/Gene Healy: Believe it or not, Reid is right about time to re-examine 9/11 authorizations.
Columnist/Cal Thomas: Hillary Clinton's health is a legitimate issue.
Columnist/Byron York: On Benghazi, GOP remains suspicious of Hillary Clinton.
Op-ed/Scot Faulkner: Reagan-era GSA cleanup shows how to fix VA after Shinseki is gone.
Beltway Confidential/Ashe Schow: A victim of the real war on women speaks out (Warning: May be disturbing for some readers).
PennAve/Susan Ferrechio: Earmarks may be dead but pet projects live on.
Legal Newsline/Kyla Asbury: Vibram agrees to $3.75 million settlement in FiveFingers running shoes class-action lawsuit.
In other news
USA Today: National landmarks threatened by climate change.
The Weekly Standard: Yes, Obamacare can still be repealed (and should be).
American Thinker: No, the Sooner State is not drying up.
The American Spectator: Eric Holder speaks at segregated school.
The Federalist: The Washington Post is super confused about where babies come from.
The Huffington Post: Thailand's army declares martial law.
UTNE Reader: Radical eco-activism and the Venus Project.
The Daily Beast: 100 Americans are waging Jihad in Syria.
Legal Insurrection: Vassar Nazi cartoon reflects campus dehumanization of Israel.
Blue Collar Perspective: Vets left to die in Benghazi or Phoenix, it's all the same to this administration.
Marginal Revolution: MIT's rise to prominence in economics.
Talking Points Memo: Ira Glass couldn't care less who edits the New York Times.
In These Times: Biggest fast-food strike ever covers six continents.
Political Wire: Ruling expected in McDonnell corruption case.