SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — In a story May 20 about California's high-speed rail project, The Associated Press, relying on information provided by the California High-Speed Rail Authority, reported erroneously that a court case in Kings County is related to the state's effort to acquire land through eminent domain. Rather, the lawsuit filed by the rail authority seeks access to properties along the proposed route in Kings County for testing.
A corrected version of the story is below:
Role of state law at issue in bullet train lawsuit
Agency argues that high-speed rail project should be exempt from state environmental review
By JULIET WILLIAMS
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California's $68 billion bullet train project should be exempt from the state's strict environmental review process now that it is subject to federal oversight, the state attorney general's office argued Tuesday in a state appellate court.
The hearing came after the federal Surface Transportation Board determined last year that it has authority over California's high-speed rail project, subjecting it to additional federal requirements.
The determination was sought by opponents of the bullet train, led by Rep. Jeff Denham, a Republican from the Central Valley. It is one of several efforts by opponents to halt construction, but they did not anticipate that a state agency would then seek a legal exemption from the state's own regulations.
If the judges agree the project is no longer subject to the California Environmental Quality Act, the state rail authority would be freed from a host of regulatory and procedural requirements that could slow construction. Opponents of the project would also lose one of their most significant legal tools.
The project's critics have repeatedly sued the state alleging violations of the state environmental law.
Tuesday's hearing before a three-judge panel of the 3rd District Court of Appeal came in a five-year old lawsuit filed by the San Francisco Bay Area cities of Atherton, Menlo Park and Palo Alto. They are seeking to block the bullet train route between that area and the Central Valley via the scenic Pacheco Pass.
They argue that the route would harm the environment.
Attorneys who argued against the state Tuesday characterized it as another legal ploy by the state in the disputed project for which voters approved selling nearly $10 billion in bonds in 2008.
"It's clear that the voters were told that CEQA would apply," attorney Stuart Flashman told the judges. He also noted that the state Legislature, which approved selling bonds for the project, discussed the idea of exempting high-speed rail from CEQA several times but never did so.
The judges have 90 days to rule.
The lawsuit is one of four involving high-speed rail:
— In the most prominent case, a Sacramento County Superior Court judge denied the state's request to sell $8.6 billion in bonds.
— In a related lawsuit, residents in the Central Valley argue that plans for the bullet train no longer comply with the promises made to voters.
— The California High-Speed Rail Authority is suing to seek access to properties along the proposed route in Kings County for testing.