Comments on:

Critics attack Chief Justice John Roberts' opinion that the Internet will safeguard against campaign corruption

Back to the article » By |
Critics of Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts' majority opinion that struck down overall limits on campaign contributions say he was wrong to assume the Internet is a sufficient substitute for government regulation. Roberts, who wrote the Supreme Court's 5-4 decision in McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, suggested that the overall limits that wealthy donors can contribute to...

To learn more about commenting on WashingtonExaminer.com and our community guidelines, please see our comments FAQ.