As a U.S. senator, Barack Obama co-sponsored the “Homeowners Defense Act,” derided as a “Beach House Bailout,” because it helps put a government backstop behind hurricane insurance. In 2008, Democrats explicitly endorsed a similar beach house bailout in their platform:

We will develop a National Catastrophic Insurance Fund to offer an affordable insurance mechanism for high-risk catastrophes that no single private insurer can cover by itself for fear of bankruptcy. This will allow states and territories to deal comprehensively with the economic dislocation of natural disasters.

Sign Up for the Timothy P. Carney newsletter!

Please enter your email address below to begin receiving the Timothy P. Carney newsletter.

You must enter a valid email address in the field above!

Thank you for signing up for the Timothy P. Carney newsletter! You should receive your first newsletter very soon.

We're sorry, there was an error processing your newsletter signup. Please click here to visit our Newsletter Signup Center to register for this newsletter.

Not only did Democrats not fulfill this unwise promise, but they’ve dropped it from their platform this year, notes R.J. Lehmann of the R Street Institute, a pro-free-market insurance-policy organization. Lehmann, in an R Street press release, applauded Democrats for moving away from the policy, which he says, “would displace private insurance markets, put taxpayers on the hook for potentially enormous losses and subsidize further development of already fragile coastal ecosystems.”

This reminds me of something I’ve seen plenty of times: environmental groups often can be allies of free-market groups when the policy in question is a subsidy that harms the environment.