Comments on:

Editorial: Ruling on EPA favors Big Energy

Back to the article » By |
When the Supreme Court ruled Monday that the Environmental Protection Agency can and probably should regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant, a Washington Post news article said the majority was "siding with environmentalists." That’s true, but a quick look at the docket in Massachusetts v. EPA reveals the liberal majority also sided with two large electric utilities that stand to profit from...

To learn more about commenting on and our community guidelines, please see our comments FAQ.