Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 18, 2013 | 05:11 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

GOP demands Senate pass budget before ‘long-term’ debt deal

January 18, 2013 | 1:27 pm | Modified: January 18, 2013 at 1:35 pm
Leave a comment

House Republicans have agreed to demand that the Senate pass a budget as a condition of any “long-term” debt-limit agreement.  “Unless the Senate acts, there will be no consideration of a long-term debt-ceiling increase,” House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said in a statement Friday after GOP meetings in Williamsburg, Virginia.

Majority Leader Harry Reid has refused to allow the Senate to pass a budget for nearly four years.  The Senate last passed a budget in April 2009 — one that contained huge increases in spending passed by the big Democratic majorities in Congress at that time.  Reid has made that elevated spending the new baseline by refusing to pass any budget since, with the government operating under a series of continuing resolutions based on the last budget that became law.  (For background on the situation, see here.)

“Since taking the majority, House Republicans have done their job,” Ryan said in the statement.  “We’ve passed a budget that promotes economic growth and gets spending under control. But for nearly four years, Senate Democrats have refused to pass a budget. Today’s agreement will hold the Senate accountable for this legal and moral failure. Just as April 15 is tax day for American families, it is budget day for Congress. Unless the Senate acts, there will be no consideration of a long-term debt-ceiling increase. I look forward to working with my colleagues—in both houses and in both parties—on this vital issue.”

There’s no word on how Democrats will react to the GOP announcement.  Simply demanding a budget — not cuts in spending, not tax reform, not restructuring of entitlements — is the most minimal and common-sense of proposals, yet Democrats have so far been united behind President Obama’s position that the debt limit must be increased with no conditions attached.

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • Responding to the Washington Post on Benghazi

    The Washington Post editorial board is quite upset with “ Republicans and conservative media obsessed ” with the “phony” issue of the administration’s misleading public explanation of...

    Read More...

  • What About the Video?

    So, what about the video? The White House last week released nearly 100 pages of emails detailing some of the discussions within the Obama administration that resulted in major revisions to...

    Read More...

  • Thomas Perez Makes a Deal

    On November 7, 2011, the Supreme Court decided to hear Magner v. Gallagher , a case about racial discrimination in housing. Oral argument was scheduled for February 29, 2012. But shortly...

    Read More...