Establishment Republicans -- to say nothing of mainstream media liberals -- don't give Heritage Action chief Michael Needham much respect. To put it charitably, that's probably because they just don't get him.
The reason they don't get Needham -- and the rest of the insurgent conservatives in the GOP -- is they don't think in terms of what is required to bring about genuine reform in Washington.
That's the challenging heart of Needham's response in The Federalist today to New York Times house conservative Ross Douthat's Jan. 18 column entitled "At last, conservative reform."
Welcome to the fight, Ross
Needham notes Douthat's tribute to insurgent GOP conservative senators Mike Lee of Utah and Marco Rubio of Florida who, according to the Timesman, have put forth proposals that "are already more interesting and promising than almost anything Republicans campaigned on in 2012.”
Needham then observes:
"Welcome, Ross, to what many of us have been saying for the last several years. Republicans ran a campaign in 2012 premised on keeping their heads down and not 'making ourselves the issue.'
"Senators Lee and Rubio have more in common, however, than just having recently introduced bold policy ideas. They also bucked this advice and ran insurgent campaigns against Establishment-backed candidates and won because they inspired people with bold ideas."
Establishments hate new ideas
Political establishments of all ideological stripes are inherently adverse to reform-minded people because they threaten existing relationships among favored special interests.
Needham cites a lengthy list of examples from the current Congress in which insurgent conservatives offered fresh approaches to problems that were drowned by the insularity and self-interest of the Establishment GOP.
The GOP's basic problem in 2014 isn't insurgent conservatives pulling the party too far to the right, it's, in Needham's words, the fact "today’s Republican Party is too often not the party of Lincoln and Reagan but instead of consultants, lobbyists and rent-seekers."
Before rejecting Needham's analysis, Establishment GOP defenders ought to cite at least one example of their introducing and pushing what Douthat calls "reform conservatism."
At least then the debate between the two camps can be over genuine ideas.
On today's washingtonexaminer.com
Columnists/Gene Healy: Obama reveals himself as a champion of the surveillance state.
Columnists/Sean Higgins: What Gov. Scott Walker learned from his recall election victory.
Columnists/Cal Thomas: The on-going shame of Benghazi cries out for a deeper investigation.
Columnists/Timothy P. Carney: Tom Coburn caused fear and loathing on Capitol Hill.
OpEds/Encounter Broadside: Getting to the truth about Obama's IRS scandal.
Opinion Special Report/Avik Roy: A conservative case for universal health insurance coverage.
Opinion Special Report/Bill Frist: Prices drop when consumers shop around.
Opinion Special Report/John C. Goodman: A simple alternative to the Obama individual mandate.
Beltway Confidential/Charlie Spiering: Chris Christie criticizes "big, expensive government" in his inaugural address.
In other news
The Washington Post: Syria peace talks go forward without Iran.
CBS News: Will China repeat America's debt crisis?
The New York Times: Parties seize on abortion as major 2014 election issue.
The Los Angeles Times: Hunt is on in Sochi for "Black Widow" terrorist.
Talking Points Memo: Olympic great Carl Lewis says Christie bullied him, too.
The Huffington Post: GOP image has changed little a year after planned reboot.
National Review Online: There is nothing accidental about Obama's foreign policy blunders.
The American Conservative: It's time to end the AUMF.
The Federalist: Sorry, America isn't destined to be more liberal.