Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 20, 2013 | 08:23 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

Inspector General: DOJ misled Congress about Fast and Furious

September 19, 2012 | 3:25 pm
Leave a comment
Photo - FILE - In this Aug. 13, 2009, file photo, acting ATF Director Kenneth Melson speaks during a news conference in San Antonio. The Justice Department's internal watchdog on Wednesday, Sept. 19, 20012, faulted the agency for misguided strategies, errors in judgment and management failures during a bungled gun-trafficking probe in Arizona that resulted in hundreds of weapons turning up at crime scenes in the U.S. and Mexico. One of those criticized in the report, Melson, who headed that office during the Fast and Furious investigation, retired upon release of the report.(AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)
FILE - In this Aug. 13, 2009, file photo, acting ATF Director Kenneth Melson speaks during a news conference in San Antonio. The Justice Department's internal watchdog on Wednesday, Sept. 19, 20012, faulted the agency for misguided strategies, errors in judgment and management failures during a bungled gun-trafficking probe in Arizona that resulted in hundreds of weapons turning up at crime scenes in the U.S. and Mexico. One of those criticized in the report, Melson, who headed that office during the Fast and Furious investigation, retired upon release of the report.(AP Photo/Eric Gay, File)

Department of Justice officials “knew or should have known” that they were providing Congress with false claims that Operation Fast and Furious was not allowing guns to be smuggled into Mexico, according to the inspector general.

The report faults DOJ for failing to take Grassley’s first question about Fast and Furious — especially as it implicitly pertained to the death of U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry — seriously.

“We found that the statement in the May 2 letter – ‘It remains our understanding that ATF’s Operation Fast and Furious
did not knowingly permit straw buyers to take guns into Mexico’ – reasonably could have been understood by Congress and the public as at least a partial reaffirmation of the February 4 letter,” the Justice Department’s inspector general report says. “However, we concluded that when the letter was drafted, Department officials knew or should have known based on information available to them that the February 4 letter contained inaccurate information and could no longer be defended in its entirety.”

The report also said that the Department officials who wrote the initial February 4 denial “should have done more to inform themselves about the allegations in Sen. Grassley’s letter and should not have relied solely on the assurances of senior officials at ATF and the U.S. Attorney’s Office that the allegations were false.”

In fact, the inspector general suggests that the Department of Justice did not take Grassley’s initial inquiry about Fast and Furious seriously.

“The allegation in Sen. Grassley’s January 27 letter that ATF had sanctioned the sale of hundreds of assault weapons contained the implication that among these weapons were two that may have been used in a firefight that resulted in the death of a federal law enforcement officer,” the report states. “We do not believe that the gravity of this allegation was met with an equally serious effort by the Department to determine whether ATF and the U.S. Attorney’s Office had allowed the sale of hundreds of weapons to straw purchasers.”

 

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • Ideological Revenue Service

    With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press...

    Read More...

  • The Real Scandal

    Everyone in Washington, except those in the crosshairs, likes a good scandal, and THE WEEKLY STANDARD is no exception. What’s more, in the case of the Obama administration, comeuppance is well...

    Read More...

  • When It Rains, It Pours

    There is no curse on the second term of presidents. When presidents lose credibility, when trust vanishes and their word is no longer accepted, they have only themselves to blame. That was true...

    Read More...