Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 18, 2013 | 04:48 PM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

Liberal mag: No one can dispute that Hugo Chavez made life better for Venezuelans

March 7, 2013 | 12:42 pm
Leave a comment

I assumed that death of the Hugo Chavez, the Venezuelan strongman, would prompt an alternately inane and offensive response from the hard-left Nation magazine. They did not disappoint.  Check out, “R.I.P., Hugo Chavez (1954-2013)” by contributing editor Robert Dreyfuss:

For now—por ahora—Venezuelans are waiting to see what happens next.

But now is the time for thinking about Hugo Chávez’s legacy. It’s a controversial one, because Chávez made mistakes and missteps along the way. But there’s no disputing the fact that the late Venezuelan leader did a lot to make life better for many, many Venezuelans. It’s rare, very rare, to find a leader of a developing country who cares passionately and deeply about the underprivileged, the poor, the downtrodden and the underserved, while simultaneously taking on the often selfish and self-interested elite, the wealthy and the privileged, who in turn make common cause with US and Western elites and the vaunted “private sector” abroad. And those Western elites find it easy to mobilize the institutions of the states in which they live, including military and intelligence agencies, to do their bidding.

No disputing?” I think Mr. Dreyfuss needs to get out of the house more often.

 

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • Ideological Revenue Service

    With three different scandals threatening to consume the White House last week—the Benghazi cover-up, the Justice Department’s seizure of the phone records of dozens of Associated Press...

    Read More...

  • The Real Scandal

    Everyone in Washington, except those in the crosshairs, likes a good scandal, and THE WEEKLY STANDARD is no exception. What’s more, in the case of the Obama administration, comeuppance is well...

    Read More...

  • When It Rains, It Pours

    There is no curse on the second term of presidents. When presidents lose credibility, when trust vanishes and their word is no longer accepted, they have only themselves to blame. That was true...

    Read More...