In his May 6 op-ed, "Now is no time for the U.S. to be a missile defense paper tiger," John Hulsman spends a lot of time worrying about a system he says does not exist.
As Airbus CEO Thomas Enders commented at the Atlantic Council last week, MEADS is “a great air defense system. Really high-end, with 360-degree capability, the only system on the planet that can shoot down missiles that come from completely different trajectories. One from the front, one from behind — and has proven it.”
MEADS, developed to replace Patriot in the U.S. and Germany, has completed three successful flight tests, including the first-ever dual intercept of ballistic missile and air-breathing targets in November. That’s very good performance for a paper system. It’s also performance that Patriot can’t match.
Nor has the German government decided on a course of action. It is continuing a study to ensure that its future air and missile defense capability requirements can be met in the most effective and affordable manner. While both Patriot and MEADS are under review under these requirements, MEADS is the only system that fully addresses them. Later this month, a very real, very tested MEADS launcher and battle manager will be on display at the ILA Berlin Air Show so German officials can clearly recognize the differences.
The stakes are high. New answers are needed for the Iskander (SS-26 Stone) tactical ballistic missile, which is said to maneuver at different altitudes and trajectories, and turns to avoid intercept. New answers are needed as well for proliferating cruise missiles and unmanned systems that can attack from any direction. By contrast, the heavy, sectored Patriot system is not a modern missile defense solution. In fact, earlier this year, Patriot was defeated in Turkey against French and Chinese competitors.
Germany recognizes the problem. Over the past five years, they've sold Patriot systems to South Korea and offered others to Poland. Now, no one should criticize the long look they've chosen to take about the future.
In Poland, to its credit, the U.S. government is supporting offers for both Patriot and MEADS for the Polish Shield. They want the Poles to select a U.S. technology system that best fits their needs and will support either system going forward.
What’s ironic is that a new design, an undeveloped next-generation Patriot concept was presented to the Polish press in March. It’s interesting that the new Patriot happens to include an advanced 360-degree radar, open architecture, and multifunctional capabilities that only MEADS has demonstrated. The next-generation Patriot concept is the true paper tiger here: Many developments, and their development price tag, have also been offered in Germany with unenthusiastic response.
That’s why Hulsman can’t just wish MEADS away.Dave Berganini is president of MEADS International. Thinking of submitting an op-ed to the Washington Examiner? Be sure to read our guidelines on submissions for editorials, available at this link.