It's often said in the journalism business that there's no news when a dog bites a man but lots of it when the man sinks his choppers in the dog.
Nothing, at least as far as the national media is concerned. Facts about EPA, as presented by the Brookings Institution, simply aren't news.
EPA word games
That's curious because Brookings is not the first place one would go to find critical analyses of the selling of the Obama/EPA climate change regulatory regime aka "the war on coal."
But that's exactly what the venerable think tank made public last week in an innocuously titled study on "Determining the proper scope of climate change benefits."
The study was conducted by Brookings Vice President and Economic Studies Director Ted Gayer and Vanderbilt University Law Professor W. Kip Viscusi.
Apples and oranges "benefits"
Washington Examiner columnist Ron Arnold zeroes in on the unexpected point of the Brookings study, noting that "the EPA cleverly selected an 'apples and oranges' methodology that overstates the benefits so the regulation looks more attractive.
"The 'apples' are $30 billion in benefits worldwide and the 'oranges' are the American taxpayers who pay the whole world’s bill."
Gayer and Viscusi were a bit more diplomatic, saying "EPA’s methodology for calculating the benefit represents a shift away from typical practice. A more traditional cost-benefit analysis would estimate climate benefits of only $2 billion to $7 billion – less than the estimated compliance cost of the rule."
Did you catch that?
In other words, EPA's method for calculating the costs and benefits of the proposed regulation isn't credible and the true costs far exceed the claimed benefits, according to a think tank nobody ever accused of being a tool of Hillary Clinton's vast right-wing conspiracy.
Sound like news? Not in the mainstream media. Searches of their websites on the study's title turned up zero results for the New York Times, Washington Post, CBS News, NBC News, USA Today, CNN and ABC News. No news stories and no opinion pieces.
The study was similarly missed by the Rightstream media, including National Review Online, Weekly Standard, Washington Times, Washington Free Beacon and Daily Caller.
Ditto in the Leftstream media, with nothing turning up in searches of the websites of The Nation, New Republic, Washington Monthly and the American Prospect.
Kentucky's Rep. Ed Whitfield will have something to say about the Brookings study Thursday when he convenes a hearing of a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee on "Standing up for jobs and energy."
On today's washingtonexaminer.com
Watchdog/Richard Pollock: CFPB exec tries to silence whistleblower before he talks to Congress.
Watchdog/EXography: Corruption in contracting encourages higher spending by state governments.
Columnists/Noemie Emery: Bad timing plagues Obama, Hillary.
Columnists/Ron Arnold: House panel to air inconvenient truths about EPA's "war on coal."
Columnists/Timothy P. Carney: Kevin McCarthy must put conservatives ahead of K Street to stay in power.
Beltway Confidential/Byron York: Hillary Clinton says keep investigating the IRS scandal.
PennAve/Susan Ferrechio: Why Darrell Issa asked IRS to hand over Lois Lerner's hard drive.
PennAve/Susan Crabtree: How Obama hopes to regain Congress' trust on Iraq.
Legal Newsline/Kyla Asbury: Best Buy agrees to $4.55 million class-action settlement in TCPA lawsuit.
In other news
The Los Angeles Times: Subsidies push Obamacare costs above projections.
The National Interest: Obama's avoidance doctrine.
The American Spectator: What does Dave Brat mean by "amnesty"?
The American Thinker: The ISIS conquest of Iraq leads straight to Jerusalem.
The Federalist: School choice fights will shift to regulations.
The Nation: Inside the Koch Brothers billionaires summit.
The Progressive: The ALEC angle in Scott Walker's toxic racial politics.
The Gateway Pundit: ISIS surrounds Baghdad on three sides, controls city's water supply.
Jammie Wearing Fools: Hillary's most overhyped book ever bombs.
Talking Points Memo: GOP senators bait shutdown over Obama's climate rules.
Democratic Strategist: Why Wall Street reform powered Dave Brat's upset of Eric Cantor.