Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 26, 2013 | 01:59 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics: White House

Obama's cautious strategy for North Africa raises concerns

January 26, 2013 | 8:00 pm
Leave a comment
Photo - In this image taken during an official visit organized by the Malian army to the town of Konna, some 680 kilometers (430 miles) north of Mali's capital Bamako, Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, a Malian soldier gestures at journalists to leave the area of a French air strike. One wing of Mali's Ansar Dine rebel group has split off to create its own movement, saying that they want to negotiate a solution to the crisis in Mali, in a declaration that indicates at least some of the members of the al-Qaida linked group are searching for a way out of the extremist movement in the wake of French air strikes. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)
In this image taken during an official visit organized by the Malian army to the town of Konna, some 680 kilometers (430 miles) north of Mali's capital Bamako, Saturday, Jan. 26, 2013, a Malian soldier gestures at journalists to leave the area of a French air strike. One wing of Mali's Ansar Dine rebel group has split off to create its own movement, saying that they want to negotiate a solution to the crisis in Mali, in a declaration that indicates at least some of the members of the al-Qaida linked group are searching for a way out of the extremist movement in the wake of French air strikes. (AP Photo/Jerome Delay)

Violence roiling Libya, Algeria and Mali is raising questions about whether President Obama's cautious strategy for dealing with the unrest in North Africa is enough to restore peace in a region where extremists and terrorist groups are taking root and expanding their reach.

The Obama administration has kept a low profile in the area, concentrating on training local military forces and providing other support. But the abduction and killing of Western hostages in Algeria, the attack on a U.S. consulate in Libya and the ongoing, French-led fight in Mali has some administration officials suggesting a more active American role there.

The escalating violence has underscored the growing strength of al Qaeda-affiliated groups in the region who are helping to destabilize national governments.

"The scale has changed; the threat has the potential to become bigger," said Stephanie Pezard, an African policy and security expert at the RAND Corp. "It's unsettling to have such a large portion of territory escaping government control. Nobody knows how much worse it can get. The French intervention [in Mali] has brought a new urgency to the U.S. decision-making process."

French military forces have taken on Islamist insurgents in Mali, but the United States and other Western nations have limited their roles to providing logistical support.

A more aggressive approach from the Obama administration would carry risks for the president, who in his inaugural address focused on the winding down of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, hoping to keep the focus on an ambitious domestic agenda for his second term.

"We need to keep a light footprint there," said Lawrence Korb, assistant secretary of defense under former President Reagan. "Some people will say that's 'leading from behind,' but it's not a serious threat to U.S. interests. Europeans have as much, if not more, interests there."

The White House has been criticized for getting involved in Libya, where NATO air power helped oust dictator Moammar Gadhafi, but staying away from Syria, where more than 40,000 people have been killed since President Bashar Assad began cracking down on opposition forces.

Both sides of the debate over a heightened U.S. intervention in Africa doubt the possibility of troop deployment to the region. However, Obama has presided over an unprecedented drone campaign in Pakistan -- and some wonder whether those efforts could extend into Africa.

In testimony on Capitol Hill, outgoing Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the threat of al Qaeda-affiliated groups in North Africa is mushrooming. And outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta recently vowed to "go after al Qaeda wherever the hell they're at."

However, the White House remains tight-lipped about its plans moving forward in North Africa.

"[Al-Qaeda in Africa] has not represented a direct threat to the homeland," said White House press secretary Jay Carney. "But you can tell by our support of the mission that the French have undertaken [in Mali] and by our overall efforts to go after, and contain and defeat extremists who would do harm to our interests, that we are very serious about this."

bhughes@washingtonexaminer.com

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • What the Data Didn’t Show

    Baltimore The presidential ambitions of Maryland governor Martin O’Malley have taken a hit after a federal investigation uncovered a sordid sex-drugs-and-racketeering ring festering right...

    Read More...

  • Do Not Disturb

    Harry Truman famously kept a sign on his desk in the Oval Office, “The Buck Stops Here.” Sixty years later, President Obama hangs a sign on the door to the Oval Office, “Do Not Disturb.”...

    Read More...

  • Citizens, Not Customers

    "We provided horrible customer service,” outgoing acting commissioner of the IRS Steven Miller told the House Ways and Means Committee on May 17, referring to evidence that his agency had...

    Read More...