Comments on:

Op-Ed: EPA's carbon regs not based on sound science

Back to the article » |
In 2007, a divided Supreme Court ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency must treat carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases as "pollutants," and must therefore analyze whether the increasing concentrations in atmospheric carbon might reasonably be anticipated to endanger human health and welfare. The court may be on the verge of facing this issue once again. To be clear, the court did...

To learn more about commenting on and our community guidelines, please see our comments FAQ.