Comments on:

Supreme Court conflicted over warrantless DNA collection

Back to the article » |
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito called the Maryland case before the justices Tuesday the most important criminal procedure question in decades: Does the Fourth Amendment allow the state to collect DNA samples from people who have been arrested but not convicted of a crime? Maryland Chief Deputy Attorney General Katherine Winfree was cut off immediately after she began the hourlong...

To learn more about commenting on WashingtonExaminer.com and our community guidelines, please see our comments FAQ.