Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 22, 2013 | 01:48 PM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

The anti-First Amendment party?

September 5, 2012 | 12:34 pm
Leave a comment

The 2012 Democratic National Platform, adopted by voice vote without an audible dissent after a rousing speech by Platform Chairman and Newark Mayor Cory Booker, states, “We support campaign finance reform, by constitutional amendment if necessary.”

And which part of the Constitution would they amend?

Obviously, the First Amendment which states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press . . . .”

The First Amendment was ratified on December 15, 1791. It’s been around for 220 years. Most of that time most Americans have thought it was a pretty good idea.

The Supreme Court has ruled over the years that it protects even student armbands, nude dancing and flag burning. But the Founders and most Americans since then have supposed that its primary purpose was to protect political speech.

The Democrats apparently disagree. Some enterprising reporter might want to ask some of them why.

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • He’s No Nixon

    The thoughtful Carl Cannon has written a piece, " Richard Milhous Obama ," concluding that our current president has more in common with our 37th than President Obama's partisans would like to...

    Read More...

  • IRS's Lerner Had History of Harassment, Inappropriate Religious Inquiries at FEC

    Perhaps no other IRS official is more intimately associated with the tax agency's growing scandal than Lois Lerner, director of the IRS’s Exempt Organizations Division. Since admitting the IRS...

    Read More...

  • Yet Another Obamacare Design Flaw

    The more the evidence emerges, the more one has to wonder: Could Obamacare have been designed any more poorly? Even those who don’t mind Obamacare’s striking consolidation of power and money...

    Read More...