Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 21, 2013 | 09:56 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

WH: ‘There will be blood’ might not mean real blood

December 11, 2012 | 2:24 pm | Modified: December 11, 2012 at 2:35 pm
Leave a comment

President Obama’s spokesman cited the ambiguity of the statement, “there will be blood,” as he avoided condemning the remark made by a Michigan Democrat who opposes the imminent state’s right-to-work legislation.

“The president believes in debate that’s civil,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said today. “I haven’t seen those comments and I’m not sure that they mean what some would interpret them to mean. I just haven’t seen them.”

Speaking on the state House floor today,  Democratic state Rep. Douglas Geiss said “There will be blood” as a result of the bill’s passage.

Relations between unions and proponents of the right-to-work bill have already gotten testy, as a crowd of protesters tore down a large tent raised by Americans for Prosperity’s Michigan chapter.

“They had knives,” AFP’s Annie Patnaude told The Washington Examiner. “They cut all of the ties (holding the tent up) and then they started slashing the tent itself… I remember them saying, ‘We’re going to destroy these people.’”

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • He’s No Nixon

    The thoughtful Carl Cannon has written a piece, " Richard Milhous Obama ," concluding that our current president has more in common with our 37th than President Obama's partisans would like to...

    Read More...

  • All Politics Isn’t Local

    The state of the union today is uneasy, at best. Washington is crippled by gridlock while Americans across the country feel alienated from their government, so much so that the president feels...

    Read More...

  • The Next Scott Brown?

    Gabriel Gomez is an ambitious guy. In January, with Massachusetts senator John Kerry all but certain to be confirmed as secretary of state, the 47-year-old Gomez wrote a letter to Governor Deval...

    Read More...