Return to Washington Examiner Homepage
May 25, 2013 | 08:55 AM
politics
Washington D.C. weather
Politics

WH: ‘There will be blood’ might not mean real blood

December 11, 2012 | 2:24 pm | Modified: December 11, 2012 at 2:35 pm
Leave a comment

President Obama’s spokesman cited the ambiguity of the statement, “there will be blood,” as he avoided condemning the remark made by a Michigan Democrat who opposes the imminent state’s right-to-work legislation.

“The president believes in debate that’s civil,” White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said today. “I haven’t seen those comments and I’m not sure that they mean what some would interpret them to mean. I just haven’t seen them.”

Speaking on the state House floor today,  Democratic state Rep. Douglas Geiss said “There will be blood” as a result of the bill’s passage.

Relations between unions and proponents of the right-to-work bill have already gotten testy, as a crowd of protesters tore down a large tent raised by Americans for Prosperity’s Michigan chapter.

“They had knives,” AFP’s Annie Patnaude told The Washington Examiner. “They cut all of the ties (holding the tent up) and then they started slashing the tent itself… I remember them saying, ‘We’re going to destroy these people.’”

From WeeklyStandard.com

  • What the Data Didn’t Show

    Baltimore The presidential ambitions of Maryland governor Martin O’Malley have taken a hit after a federal investigation uncovered a sordid sex-drugs-and-racketeering ring festering right...

    Read More...

  • Do Not Disturb

    Harry Truman famously kept a sign on his desk in the Oval Office, “The Buck Stops Here.” Sixty years later, President Obama hangs a sign on the door to the Oval Office, “Do Not Disturb.”...

    Read More...

  • Citizens, Not Customers

    "We provided horrible customer service,” outgoing acting commissioner of the IRS Steven Miller told the House Ways and Means Committee on May 17, referring to evidence that his agency had...

    Read More...