Comments on:

White House factcheck: EPA overstates benefit of new rule based on bad science

Back to the article » |
White House officials concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) significantly overstated the economic benefits of a proposed rule cutting formaldehyde emissions, largely because the agency persisted in relying on scientific claims that federal peer reviewers deemed incredible. “The EPA has been gaming the system by grossly exaggerating economic benefits to justify its costly...

To learn more about commenting on and our community guidelines, please see our comments FAQ.