Trump has four bad choices on Iran. Here’s the least horrible one

Published July 29, 2026 10:00am ET



In his meeting with President Donald Trump this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented fresh intelligence that he says shows Iran is rebuilding elements of its nuclear program, apparently seeking to compel a resumption of the full-scale war. The decision rests almost completely with Trump, and no one knows where it will go.

The first path would amount to accepting Iranian demands. It will charge for passage through the Strait of Hormuz, give little on the nuclear issue, give nothing on the proxy terrorist militias or ballistic missiles, and effectively retain the right to massacre protesters. Markets would welcome the immediate reduction in risk. Oil prices and insurance premiums would return to normal levels, and investors would breathe easier. Yet every authoritarian government would be emboldened, and other maritime choke points would be endangered by copycats, while Iran’s leadership would emerge stronger. Temporary calm would mask a lasting deterioration in deterrence.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.