Trump wants to kill the roadless rule: Trees aren’t worth more than lives

Published August 28, 2026 7:00am ET



The U.S. Forest Service filed a proposed rule today to erase a 25-year-old federal restriction covering nearly 45 million acres of national forest. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins says overgrown stands, insect outbreaks, and disease have turned healthy landscapes into tinderboxes. I’ve lived in California since 1990, long enough to watch the same story repeat itself every fall when the Santa Ana winds pick up. I’ve packed a go-bag more than once when a red flag warning went up near Ladera Ranch. The brush grows all year while the lawyers argue, and then October shows up with a lighter.

The 2001 Roadless Rule bans new road building and most logging on undeveloped national forest land. It sounds tidy on paper: keep the wilderness wild. In practice, it locks up almost a third of the National Forest System, including 60% of Utah’s forest land, 58% of Montana’s, and 92% of Alaska’s Tongass National Forest, the largest in the country, and hands veto power to whoever can find a sympathetic judge. Idaho and Colorado carved out their own state-specific rules years ago and kept local control. The other 48 states got the one-size-fits-all version, written in Washington by people who will never evacuate a canyon at 2 in the morning.

Already a print subscriber? Click here to login/register your account

Trusted reporting.Unlimited access.

Subscribe for full access to Washington Examiner coverage, expert political analysis, and subscriber-only journalism.

Get Unlimited Access

Already a member? Log in

Cancel anytime.